![]() Winner: Tie exFAT vs NTFS: Which One is the Best Option? The NTFS file system has some cross-platform compatibility issues, whereas the exFAT doesn’t have this issue. On the other hand, the exFAT file system can be used either for the external device or whenever you want to store or transfer files larger than 4 GB. EXTFS VS NTFS INSTALLThe NTFS file system is best for the internal usage and you can use it whenever you want to install a heavy software on your device. In terms of usage, both the files system have their own uses. EXTFS VS NTFS FULLThe NTFS still holds the top place as it’s available on almost all the operating systems.Īlso Read:- MacBook Pro Vs Air – Full in Depth Comparison 3. ![]() EXTFS VS NTFS ANDROIDThe NTFS file system is compatible with Windows, MAC, Linux, and Xbox gaming console only, whereas the exFAT file system is compatible with Windows, MAC, Linux, and even on Android devices. When we look at compatibility, both the file systems seem to be compatible with almost every device, but still, there are some differences in terms of compatibility. But it doesn’t have the abilities and features which you can find in the NTFS file system.Īlso Read:- Ecobee vs Nest: Which One is the Best Option to Choose? NTFS vs exFAT: Compatibility On the other hand, the exFAT holds the same size of 16 EB. The development of NTFS was started back in 1980 and now it has the ability to store files up to 16 EB which might be equal to the 18,446,744,073,709,550,592 bytes. In the case of storage, the NTFS provides you the ability to store inexhaustible files, whereas the exFAT has the ability to store the file size of up to 4 to 10 GB. There are different types of file system, but today we are going to discuss the two exFAT and NTFS. The sole purpose of the File system is to store data and help your device to recognize it without having any problems. If the file system gets removed from your device, then your device will have only a large amount of unorganized data and information. It helps your computer to recognize data and store it in an organized manner. Thanks, Alex, to alerting me to the witnessed speed difference, I had never noticed it or known about it before.What is a File System and What’s its Purpose?Ī Filesystem is a set of rules and data which is set in in order to decide the way in which the information will be stored on your device. exFAT shines when reading/writing large files to USB disks which is optimal for things like games and movies. However, once the files reach medium size NTFS and exFAT are near the same speed. In actual performance, NTFS handles smaller files faster than both exFAT and FAT32. Gaming with games installed on an external hard drive requires exFAT to reach the read speed needed for decent gaming. However, exFAT acts faster when used as the file system for external drives as the read/write speeds are handled differently over USB connections and between operating systems. It consistently outperforms exFAT efficiency and uses fewer system resources. NTFS is faster as an internal drive file system. The paragraph "which one is faster" is worth copying to here.įaster is relative. Google comes to my aid and exFAT design caters better for flash drives it says. My computer fixing days are long gone so I simply use stuff that works now and worry a lot less about how it works. ![]() I guess exFAT has a single index so a rebuild (because of a perceived index fault) would be a much more arduous task. The dual index has paid off for me once or twice as I have seen the message with an HDD "rebuilding index from duplicate" or some wording like that to tell me that having NTFS was worth it. NTFS manages a dual index arrangement so maybe that's why it's a bit slower. EXTFS VS NTFS WINDOWSThe NTFS one intended for Windows only originally. Most now sold as exFAT so they are instantly compatible with both Windows and Mac. Interesting, never tried the same experiment. So I wonder if the type of format had anything to do with your 16 & 64G drives running at different speeds. Turned out after formatting both to exFAT they both ran at the faster speed by a factor of 2+. I knew from markings I had put on them (I had marked them "fast" and "slow" so I could tell them apart) that the exFAT format was the faster drive so I formatted them both to exFAT. That's when I noticed one was formatted to exFAT and the other was either NTFS or FAT32 (but I forget which). I decided I would format them both in hope this would clear up whatever problem that might exist. They were both supposed to be USB3 but I doubted the slower one was. I noticed that one drive was very noticeably faster than the other and wondered why as they were supposed to be identical (but I had bought them a couple of months apart). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |